71years . Baptised as an infant. Catholic ancestors go back to Goa. Urban hermit. Discoverer of The Rational Premise and VC2 rational and irrational. Break for trads.Discovered late in life that with LG 16 visible we get the New Theology and with LG 16 invisible we return to the Scholastic theology on EENS etc.
March 17. St. Patrick. Baptised at St. Patrick's Cathedral. Studied at St. Patrick's School,Graduated from St. Patrick's College, Karachi. Irish missionaries!
Eldest son of Luke and Maggie Andrades.Completed semesters in theology , with exams and credit points, at the National Catholic Institute of Theology, Karachi.
Studied Philosophy at the University Pontificia Regina Apostoloum, Rome. Final semester left. Also attended corses in Theology and Latin.
Catholic lay man in Rome. Discoverer of Feeneyism versus Cushingism, the Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II, a breakthrough for the present Catholic Church.The sedevacantists reject the pope because of Vatican Council II irrational. When the Council is rational it supports Tradition. There is no reason for them to reject the Council or the pope. Even the SSPX can now accept Vatican Council II , rational, and meet the demand that they accept the Council. The Council is in harmony with Tradition. So they can ask for canonical recognition. They can also demand that Pope Leo XIV interpret Vatican Council II rationally, since this is ethical and that he also accept Tradition, as did Pope Leo XIII. The main line Catholic Church must now be traditional since the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms can only be interpreted rationally and the conclusion is traditional.
SSPX INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY LIKE POPE FRANCIS IN EVANGELII GAUDIUM
18.04.2026
SSPX INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY LIKE POPE FRANCIS IN EVANGELII GAUDIUM
With the New Theology the SSPX are liberals on Ecumenism and Inter-Religious Dialogue, like the pope and the cardinals and bishops. Cushingism is liberalism and schism.
They cite Tradition but in Tradition there were no separation between state and Church. Presently Pope Leo is aligned with the leftist state.
The SSPX maintains the separation of Church and State, a leftist concept. Since they use the New Theology, created with the False Premise they have collegiality, with the liberals.
With the New Theology they are liberals on Ecumenism and Inter-Religious Dialogue, like the pope and the cardinals and bishops. Cushingism is liberalism and schism.
They cite Tradition but in Tradition there were no separation between state and Church. Presently Pope Leo is aligned with the leftist state.
They interpret Vatican Council II as does Pope Francis in Evangelii Gaudium(EG).
Evangelii Gaudium …Altro
WHO AM I TO WRITE ALL THIS? : A BREAKTHROUGH ON VATICAN COUNCIL II. UNPRECEDENTED
18.04.2026
WHO AM I TO WRITE ALL THIS? : A BREAKTHROUGH ON VATICAN COUNCIL II. UNPRECEDENTED
Who am I to write all this?
1. 1. I am the discoverer of a rational and irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
2. 2. There is a historical interpretation of Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Councils etc) rationally or irrationally, with Feeneyism or Cushingism.
3. 3.There is a magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church even if the pope, cardinals and bishops are irrational, non traditional, schismatic , non apostolic and non magisterial on certain issues.
4. 4.Discovered that in general Catholics with doctorates and master’s degrees in theology are irrational and schismatic and political-left.
5. 5.I have discovered that the books on Vatican Council II in general are obsolete and outdated with the false premise and liberal conclusion. The Council can only be interpreted rationally and non schismatically.
6. 6.Ad Gentes 7 says …Altro
CONSISTORY IN JUNE WILL ONCE AGAIN INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY AND NOT RATIONALLY
16.04.2026
CONSISTORY IN JUNE WILL ONCE AGAIN INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY AND NOT RATIONALLY
Dignitais Humane, in Vatican Council II is traditional when you interpret it rationally. This was not known to John Courtney Murray, Hans Kung, Joseph Ratzinger and others who interpret the Council with schismatic Cushingism.
With Vatican Council II rational, there is no change in the ecclesiology of the Church so how can Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez justify Amoris Laetitia and Gaudium Evangelii.
Similarly the ecumenism, inter-religious dialogue and concept of salvation for the Jews in Gaudium Evangelii is not compatible with Vatican Council II interpreted only honestly.
Once again there will be a consistory of Pope Leo based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally, a fundamental flaw in the theology of Pope Francis in Evangelii Gaudium and Amoris Laeitia.
Why must Catholics interpret LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being explicit and not …Altro
Cushingite liberalism, of Pope Leo and the cardinals and bishops, is now irrational, schismatic and obsolete. It no more is an option : the mainline Church becomes traditionalist
15.04.2026
Cushingite liberalism, of Pope Leo and the cardinals and bishops, is now irrational, schismatic and obsolete. It no more is an option : the mainline Church becomes traditionalist
Archbishop Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney, traditionalists, did not mention Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, which would be aligned with the EENS of the Church Councils, with no exceptions. This is now a discovery in the Catholic Church.
The mainline Church becomes traditionalist, but not Cushingite traditionalists like the SSPX but Feeneyite traditionalists like the St. Benedict Center in Richmond, New Hampshire, USA.
The main line Catholic Church returns to Tradition, with Vatican Council II rational and is no more liberal.
Even though I affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with no known exceptions, the real issue now in the Catholic Church, is Vatican Council II, having no exceptions for EENS. This is troublesome for the SSPX priests and laity at their St. Catherine of …Altro
WE CAN INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY OR IRRATIONALLY, WITH THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY OR RUPTURE, WE CAN CHOOSE : IT IS NO MORE EITHER-OR
15.04.2026
WE CAN INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY OR IRRATIONALLY, WITH THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY OR RUPTURE, WE CAN CHOOSE : IT IS NO MORE EITHER-OR
So the Society of St. Pius X can accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally and also Tradition. They are not opposed to each other.
The Ecclesia Dei communities and the sedevacantists are not obliged to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally like Pope Leo, the cardinals and the bishops. They now have a rational and traditional choice. The irraional version produces the common schism.
We can interpret Vatican Council II rationally or irrationally, with the hermeneutic of continuity or rupture with Tradition. It is as simple as turning on a light switch. We can choose Tradition or schism.
When LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible and hypothetical cases only in 2026, this is the rational interpretation.
When LG 8 etc refer to visible and personally known people in 2026 this is the …Altro
FRENCH BISHOPS WANT THE LITURGY TO CONFORM TO VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL AND NOT RATIONAL
14.04.2026
FRENCH BISHOPS WANT THE LITURGY TO CONFORM TO VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL AND NOT RATIONAL
Canonically the mainline French bishops are in schism with Vatican Council II irrational and the New Missal, being Cushingite and also schismatic.
French bishops and Pope Leo did not protest against the hate directed against Carrie Prejean Boller who said Christ is King and lost her job with the U.S Government because of her Catholic faith.
Cardinal Jean-Marc Aveline of Marseille, president of the French bishops, told KTO on April 5, it was reported on Gloria TV that the liturgy must conform to Vatican Council II irrational. This is false. The liturgy must be aligned only with Vatican Council II rational. Vatican Council II rational is eclesiocentric and traditional.
Vatican Council II, with Ad Gentes 7 not contradicted by Lumen Gentium 16, is Feeneyite and traditionalist, like the French Catholic Church over the centuries. Today the French Catholic Church is Cushingite and schismatic …Altro
The real doctrinal problem today is with Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez who use the LG 16 visible heresy and the SSPX does not seem to know it
13.04.2026
The real doctrinal problem today is with Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez who use the LG 16 visible heresy and the SSPX does not seem to know it.
Roberto dei Mattei’s books and videos are put out with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. He uses the New Theology which has come from Rahner and Ratzinger in 1965 with the LG 16 visible heresy. Rahner and Ratzinger were never excommunicated.
With LG 16 invisible Roberto de Mattei would become a Feeneyite traditionalist. He avoids this label to remain politically correct with the Left.
Why is he allowed to receive the Eucharist at Holy Mass at the FSSP church in Rome?
1. He interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and so there are explicit exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesia nulla salus (EENS). He does not affirm an EENS with no exceptions.
I interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so there are no explicit exceptions for the dogma EENS of the Council of Florence 1442. LG 8, 14, 16 etc refer to hypothetical and …Altro
@Strong and Steadfast Engage!
POPE LEO INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II SCHISMATICALLY WITH THE LG 16 VISIBLE HERESY : CHANGES THE CREEDS AT HOLY MASS
12.04.2026
POPE LEO INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II SCHISMATICALLY WITH THE LG 16 VISIBLE HERESY : CHANGES THE CREEDS AT HOLY MASS
Pope Francis did not tell Fr. Stefano Mannelli F.I that Vatican Council II supports Tradition.Pope Leo does not tell the SSPX that Cardinal Fernandez is in schism.
A nihil obstat and imprimatur are needed for Karl Rahner's books but also that of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger published by Igantius Press.
Why go for Pope Leo’s Holy Mass when he has changed the understanding of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms and no cardinal, bishop or priest can defend him?
Any journalist an confirm that with the LG 16 visible mistake, Pope Leo’s understanding of the Athanasius, Nicene and Apostles Creed is not the same as it was for the saints Augustine and Aquinas. There is also a rupture with the dogma extra cclesiam nulla salus of the Magisterium of the 16th century, for example. There is a schismatic break with the Magisterium of the Middle Ages.
On abortion, Pope Leo has …Altro
Why don't you stop worshipping "Twitter"?
Apparently, "Twitter" is your Magisterium.
HOW CAN POPE LEO BE THE POPE ?
11. 04.2026
HOW CAN POPE LEO BE THE POPE ?
Pope Leo and Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez are in schism with LG 16 visible.With LG 16 invisible they become Feeneyite traditionalists.
In schism they continue to penalize the St. Benedict Center (SBC) in New Hampshire, USA. The Feeneyite traditionalists there interpret Vatican Council II with LG 16 invisible. They affirm all the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms, also rationally.
In schism, Fernandez declared the traditionalist Archbishop Vigano to be in schism.Vigano will not accept Vatican Council II interpreted schismatically like Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez.
While in schism Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez threaten the SSPX with a schism-charge. The SSPX rejects the schismatic and non traditional conclusion of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. The SSPX affirms Tradition without Vatican Council II irrational. They will ordain new bishops who will do the same. In China the new bishops accept Vatican Council II interpreted …Altro
CARDINAL RATZINGER DID NOT ALLOW THE SSPX TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY, TRADITIONALLY AND SO CANONICALLY : HE WAS IN DOCTRINAL SCHISM WITH ‘ LG 16 VISIBLE’
09.04.2026
CARDINAL RATZINGER DID NOT ALLOW THE SSPX TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY, TRADITIONALLY AND SO CANONICALLY : HE WAS IN DOCTRINAL SCHISM WITH ‘ LG 16 VISIBLE’
Cardinal Ratzinger did not allow the SSPX to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, traditionally and so canonically: he was in doctrinal schism with ‘LG 16 visible’.
Ratzinger kept it a secret. He was in schism with the LG 16-visible premise. He allowed the traditionalist Fr. Leonard Feeney in Boston to remain excommunicated in 1965.He did not announce that Feeney was correct there were no visible cases of the baptism of desire. He kept silent.
Then he excommunicated the Cushingite traditionalist Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops. They had rejected the non traditional conclusion of Vatican Council II. The Council emerged non traditional when it was interpreted with the LG 16 visible premise of Karl Rahner. This error of Rahner is there in his book The Christian of the Future.
Pope Benedict …Altro
CARDINALS FERNANDEZ, LADARIA, O’MALLEY, BISHOP LIBASCI AND FR. LAIRE LIKE CARDINAL RATZINGER, INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II UNETHICALLY AND SCHISMATICALLY.
08.04.2026
CARDINALS FERNANDEZ, LADARIA, O’MALLEY, BISHOP LIBASCI AND FR. LAIRE LIKE CARDINAL RATZINGER, INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II UNETHICALLY AND SCHISMATICALLY.
The popes from Pius XII to Leo XIV have been in schism on a particular point. With Vatican Council II and the Catechism interpreted rationally they become Feeneyite traditionalists overnight.This is a secret they keep hidden.
Cardinals Burke, Sarah, and Bishop Athanasius Schneidrer would also become Feeneyite traditionalists when Ad Gentes 7 is aligned with EENS and LG 16 is not an explicit exception for AG 7 or EENS.
In 1965 when the excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feneey was still not lifted, Fr. Joseph Ratzinger did not announce that Lumen Gentium 16 in Vatican Council II was not an explicit exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Council of Florence . The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop’ of Boston confused implicit cases of the baptism of desire as being explicit examples of …Altro
CARD.FERNANDEZ IS IN SCHISM ON VATICAN COUNCIL II LIKE CARDINAL RATZINGER : CANONICALLY HE CANNOT EXCOMMUNICATE THE SSPX
07.04.2026
CARD.FERNANDEZ IS IN SCHISM ON VATICAN COUNCIL II LIKE CARDINAL RATZINGER : CANONICALLY HE CANNOT EXCOMMUNICATE THE SSPX
I affirm Ad Gentes 7 with LG 16 not being an exception for AG 7. This is the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II. Cardinal Ratzinger would affirm LG 16 as an exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Pius IX.There was a rupture with the past. This was schism. He was automatically excommunicated?
Schism is a mortal sin of faith and he had changed the interpretation of the Creeds, with alleged visible LG 16.
For Cardinal Ratzinger, Lumen Gentium 16, being saved in invincible ignorance outside the Catholic Church, was a visible case. For me it is invisible.
For him LG 16 was a visible example of salvation outside the Catholic Church and an explicit exception for the dogma EENS of the Council of Florence 1442, which did not mention any exceptions. For me LG 16 is invisible and so does not contradict …Altro
RATZINGER FOLLOWED RAHNER’S FACTUAL ERROR WHICH PRODUCES SCHISM AND CALLS FOR AUTOMATIC EXCOMMUNICATION : HE DID NOT TELL THE CHURCH ABOUT A RATIONAL AND NON SCHISMATIC ALTERNATIVE
04.04.2026
RATZINGER FOLLOWED RAHNER’S FACTUAL ERROR WHICH PRODUCES SCHISM AND CALLS FOR AUTOMATIC EXCOMMUNICATION : HE DID NOT TELL THE CHURCH ABOUT A RATIONAL AND NON SCHISMATIC ALTERNATIVE
We no more have a schismatic Church created with a fake premise and inference and so the conclusion is non traditional. We have a rational and orthodox choice.
LIBERALS HAD TO BE EXCOMMUNICATED
It was Ratzinger, Rahner, Congar, Balthazar and Kung and others, who had to be excommunicated since Karl Rahner’s LG 16 visible premise was heresy and schism. Rahner’s book, ‘The Christian of the Future’, has no support in Vatican Council II, rational. Rahner’s books need to be pulled back.
Vatican Council II interpreted rationally is aligned doctrinally with Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no known exceptions.
Cardinal Ratzinger as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith did not announce the obvious i.e LG 8, 14, 16, NA 2, GS 22 etc are …Altro
@Lionel Leslie Andrades Thank you for your hard work! Happy Easter!
VATICAN COUNCIL II SUPPORTS FR. LEONARD FEENEY WAS RATZINGERS HIDDEN SECRET: LEFEBVRE DID NOT KNOW
02.04.2025
VATICAN COUNCIL II SUPPORTS FR. LEONARD FEENEY WAS RATZINGERS HIDDEN SECRET: LEFEBVRE DID NOT KNOW
This is the discovery now. Vatican Council II interpreted rationally is aligned doctrinally with Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no known exceptions.
The entire Vatican Council II drama would have been avoided, if Cardinal Ratzinger as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith announced that LG 8, 14, 16, NA 2, GS 22 etc are hypothetical cases only. So Vatican Council II has no explicit exceptions for Feeneyite EENS, the EENS of the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century. LG 8, 14, 16 refer to invisible cases was the secret. He kept it hidden.
The Council is traditional and not liberal any more- this is the bottom line.
Today we know. It is like the Council has done a somersault, a grand U-turn. With Vatican Council II aligned with Tradition (Syllabus, EENS, Athanasius Creed, etc), the Council is no more ‘a …Altro
I don’t believe the problems with VII and the” new theology” are simply reducible to an incorrect interpretation of EENS. I think you identify an important distinction with your analysis. But it doesn’t solve the underlying currents of thought that dominate and corrupt the hierarchy I.e. independence, immanentism, evolution. Pax.
FRENCH BISHOPS ASSEMBLY/CONFC. VIOLATE CANON LAW
01.04.2026
PENDING CANONICAL ISSUES -10
FRENCH BISHOPS ASSEMBLY/CONFC. VIOLATE CANON LAW
Pope Leo sent a message to the French bishops for their General Assembly and cited education, the liturgy etc, all which have to be in harmony with Vatican Council II, irrational, the Council interpreted with the irrational and not rational premise and inference, to produce a fake, liberal conclusion. In other words, implicit cases of LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II must all be seen as explicit, known and visible examples salvation outside the Catholic Church and so objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence 1442, which did not mention any exceptions. So the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal at the Latin Mass would remain obsolete for Pope Leo and the French bishops.
EDUCATION : So in schools, colleges and universities in France, they are not allowed to interpret Vatican Council II rationally i.e. LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3,…Altro
CANONICAL PETITION: BISHOP MICHAEL T. MARTIN OFM Conv., DIOCESE OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, USA
01.04.2026
CANONICAL PETITION: BISHOP MICHAEL T. MARTIN OFM Conv., DIOCESE OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, USA
If I was living in the Diocese of Charlotte, I could file a canonical petition saying I interpret Vatican Council II rationally and Bishop Michael T. Martin irrationally and so politically. He has no right to be a bishop.
I would say that the baptism of desire refers to an invisible case in 2026 for me, but is a visible, known person, saved outside the Catholic Church, in 2026, for the bishop. So Lumen Gentium 14 is an explicit exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Council of Florence 1442 etc) for Bishop Martin but not for me. He is in schism with the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century. For the Jesuits in the Middle Ages the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, referred to hypothetical cases only. This is common sense.
So for me the Athanasius Creed has no exceptions in Vatican Council II but for Bishop Martin explicit cases…Altro
PENDING CANONICAL ISSUES-6 CARDINAL PAROLIN DOES NOT AFFIRM THE CATHOLIC FAITH BEFORE AMBASSADORS AND FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS: SCHISM ON THE CREEDS ETC.
26.03.2026
PENDING CANONICAL ISSUES-6
CARDINAL PAROLIN DOES NOT AFFIRM THE CATHOLIC FAITH BEFORE AMBASSADORS AND FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS: SCHISM ON THE CREEDS ETC.
We have a new discovery in the Catholic Church which corrects a common error which originated in big way with the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (LOHO).
The discovery is:-
1-. There is a Rational and Irrational Interpretation of Vatican Council II with a Rational and Irrational Premise to produce a traditional or liberal conclusion.
2. Tradition can be interpreted rationally or irrationally, with Feeneyism or Cushingism.
3. Graphics shows that the hypothetical cases (marked in red) are not explicit exceptions ( they do not contradict) for the orthodox passages marked in blue, which are in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
4. The 1949 LOHO confused invisible cases of the baptisms of desire as being visible exceptions for the dogma EENS. So it has a heretical and schismatic conclusion …Altro
Una generosa VERITA! PICCARRETA
CARD.ROCHE DOES NOT AFFIRM DE FIDE TEACHINGS NOR INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY: DISQUALIFICATION FOR OFFICE.
25.03.2026
CARD.ROCHE DOES NOT AFFIRM DE FIDE TEACHINGS NOR INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY: DISQUALIFICATION FOR OFFICE.
How can Cardinal Arthur Roche canonically hold his office as Prefect of the Dicastery for Divine Worship and the Sacraments and offer Holy Mass, when there are so many impediments visible in his public life ?
We have a new discovery. It changes the way we look at Vatican Council II.
The discovery is of :1. A Rational and Irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II of Vatican Council II.2. A Rational and Irrational Interpretation of Tradition, Feeneyite and Cushingite.3. There are graphics which show that the hypothetical (red) passages in Vatican Council II do not contradict the orthodox (blue) passages in the Council-text.
So there are new canonical issues.
LITURGY
How can Cardinal Arthur Roche, the Prefect of the Dicastery for Divine Worship and the Sacraments offer Holy Mass when he does not interpret rationally the Athanasius Creed, with no …Altro
24.03.2026 QUESTIONI CANONICHE IN SOSPESO 4: IL VESCOVO FRANCOIS TOUVET DI FREJUF-TOULON, FRANCIA, HA UN'INTERPRETAZIONE IRRAZIONALE DEL CONCILIO VATICANO II, DEI CREDI E DEI CATECHISMI: SCISMO
24.03.2026
QUESTIONI CANONICHE IN SOSPESO 4: IL VESCOVO FRANCOIS TOUVET DI FREJUF-TOULON, FRANCIA, HA UN'INTERPRETAZIONE IRRAZIONALE DEL CONCILIO VATICANO II, DEI CREDI E DEI CATECHISMI: SCISMO
Il vescovo François Touvet è diventato vescovo di Tolone-Frejuf nel 2025, succedendo al vescovo Dominique Rey. Interpreta il Concilio Vaticano II in modo irrazionale e non etico. Questo costituisce una causa di inidoneità per un vescovo. Inoltre, la Visita del vescovo Rey non è stata apostolica, poiché solo un'interpretazione razionale del Concilio Vaticano II è apostolica e magisteriale. Questa non era la posizione dottrinale della Visita ecclesiastica.
1. John Courtney Murray ha interpretato il Concilio Vaticano II in modo scismatico. È stato irrazionale. Lo stesso vale per il vescovo di Frejuf-Tolone. Egli è scismatico riguardo ai Credi, ai Concili e ai Catechismi, quando li interpreta con una premessa errata.
Per me la Dignitatis Humanae afferma: In primo luogo, il Concilio professa la sua …Altro
QUESTIONS CANONIQUES EN COURS 4 : L’INTERPRÉTATION IRRATIONNELLE DE L’ÉVÊQUE FRANÇOIS TOUVET À FRÉJUF-TOULON (FRANCE) CONCERNANT LE CONCILE VATICAN II, LES CRÉDOS ET LES CATÉCHISME : SCHISME
24.03.2026
QUESTIONS CANONIQUES EN COURS 4 : L’INTERPRÉTATION IRRATIONNELLE DE L’ÉVÊQUE FRANÇOIS TOUVET À FRÉJUF-TOULON (FRANCE) CONCERNANT LE CONCILE VATICAN II, LES CRÉDOS ET LES CATÉCHISME : SCHISME
L’évêque François Touvet est devenu évêque de Toulon-Fréjuf en 2025, succédant à l’évêque Dominique Rey. Son interprétation du Concile Vatican II est irrationnelle et contraire à l’éthique, ce qui constitue un motif de disqualification pour un évêque. De plus, la visite épiscopale de Mgr Rey n’était pas apostolique, car seul le Concile Vatican II, interprété rationnellement, est apostolique et magistériel. Cette position n’était pas conforme à la doctrine de la visite ecclésiastique.
1. John Courtney Murray a interprété le Concile Vatican II de manière schismatique. Son interprétation était irrationnelle. Il en va de même pour l’évêque de Fréjuf-Toulon. Il est schismatique au sujet des Credos, des Conciles et des Catéchismes, lorsqu'il les interprète à partir d'une …Altro
Vous devrez étudier les documents diffusés sur ma chaîne Gloria TV. Consultez également les graphiques, ils vous seront utiles. Tout ceci est nouveau. C'est une découverte. Cela change notre façon d'interpréter le Concile Vatican II et les catéchismes, etc. Il serait utile que je puisse réaliser une vidéo ou m'adresser au public. Jusqu'à présent, je n'ai produit aucune vidéo ni accordé aucune interview, mais je suis prêt à le faire. Je suis à l'origine de cette nouvelle interprétation du Concile Vatican II. Ainsi, nous avons désormais un Concile Vatican II rationnel et traditionnel. Il n'est pas schismatique.
Fréjus et non Fréjuf ? exposé difficile à comprendre. Je pense que Vatican II n'est pas magistériel. Il est "pastoral" d'après les enseignements reçus, il y a des années et on en a fait un concile dogmatique puisqu'il a supprimé énormément de choses de la foi et de la vie catholique à commencer par la messe. si quelqu'un peut expliquer plus clairement.... Merci